GASPRO International Journal of Eminent Scholars
Guides For Authors
- Call For Papers
- Processing Charges
- Journal Coverage
- Open Access Policy
- Terms and Policies
Trending Topics
Secured Payment
LEGAL SYSTEM OF NIGERIA: INVESTIGATING STRATEGIC WAYS OF MITIGATING DELAY IN JUDGMENT
ABSTRACT
This study examined the legal system of Nigeria,
investigating strategic ways of mitigating delay in judgment. The legal system
of any nation serves as the backbone of justice, order, and societal progress.
In Nigeria, a country with a vibrant and diverse population, the judiciary
holds the crucial mandate of safeguarding the rule of law and ensuring that
justice prevails. To carry out this research, numerous subheads were taken into
consideration, some of which included the concept of legal system and the
concept of delay in judgment. Some of the noted cases of delay in judgment as
mentioned in the study included cases of Ekiri v. Kemiside & Ors, NWLR145
(1976), Joseph Ozoma & Ors v. M. Osanwuta UHC/30/679 (1969), and Atejioye
v. Ayeni. The study mentioned the causes of delay in judgment to include
overloaded judicial systems, procedural complexities, inadequate infrastructure/resources,
and tactical delays by parties. The study mentioned the ways to mitigate delay
in judgment to include judicial system reformation, enhancing judicial
infrastructure/capacity, leveraging technology, and addressing
corruption/bureaucratic bottlenecks. The study concluded that the legal system
is the backbone of justice and societal progress, ensuring order and fairness.
One of the recommendations made was that the Nigerian judiciary should embrace
technology to enhance efficiency. Digitising court records, implementing
e-filing systems, and introducing virtual court hearings can reduce delays
associated with manual processes.
KEYWORDS: Legal System, Delay in Judgment and Nigeria
Download Article
Featured Article
Global Studies Quaterly
Bioinformatics Advances
Bioscience & Technology
Latest Articles
ISSN(Hardcopy)
2630 - 7200
ISSN(Softcopy)
2659 - 1057
Impact Factor
5.693
